Czar Nicholas II's declaration of abdication in Source 1 is best understood in light of which of the following?
(A) Economic prosperity that fostered dislike of the
aristocracy
(B) Widespread dislike of Nicholas's tolerance of
political dissidents
(C) Large-scale military losses and resentment of the
working classes
(D) Persecution of religious minorities

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n:

boundary is what it refers to hope this

explanation:

very carefuly thats what i say