Imagine you are researching the effects of the Black Death in Europe. You have two sources available to you. Source A: a student-produced website about the plague

Source B: a book written by a historian who is an expert on medieval Europe

Which source do you trust more? Why?
pls answer quick

Explanation:

Let's analyze each source.

Source A: student produced website

A website made by a student isn't trustworthy. It's hard to know where they got their information, how valid their sources are, and how much they paraphrased or changed information.

Source B: book written by a historian

This source is much more trustworthy. A historian is almost always reliable with great sources and information.

If you are researching, a book written by a historian (Source B) is much more trustworthy.

False gulids were what you were so no it is false you dumb