The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people a- under arrest as juveniles have many of the same rights as adults
b- accused of crimes have the right to a second trial upon request
c- who cannot afford an attorney must be provided one by the state
d- that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement

d- that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement

Explanation:

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement.

This was as a result of an arrest made by law enforcement officials who failed to read the Miranda rights to a suspect which was later challenged in court as inadmissible as evidence.

c) troops march forward in close formation against newer, more accurate weapons

aa dikha du tujhe mera wala dance