How does the author's discussion of Bethel School District v. Fraser contribute to the development of ideas
in the text (Paragraphs 22-23)?
A. It suggests that the results of the Tinker case didn't
actually ensure the protection of students' free speech
in school.
B. It emphasizes the idea that the Supreme Court not
only interprets the Bill of Rights to protect natural
rights, but also to determine the extent of them.
C. It shows how the Supreme Court's reinterpretations of
the Bill of Rights primarily limit rights, rather than
protect them
D. It highlights how confusing the Bill of Rights is, and
how the Supreme Court is the only group of people
qualified to interpret it.

the nationalists wanted a strong central government so the new country wouldn't fall apart.

- r3ktforgood ☕

frederick william of brandenburg-prussia trained his son, frederick, to be a hardy soldier. but frederick disliked rifle shooting and horseback riding. unlike his father, he was interested in french literature. he enjoyed poetry and music and, like some others of the enlightenment, he scoffed at religion. his father thought him soft, frivolous and unmindful of his duties. and when frederick refused to put his signature on a right to succession, for a few moments his father strangled him.

attacks by the seljuk. a devastating blow to the entire byzantine world was dealt by christian crusaders from the west. the venetians were eager to destroy byzantine power and offered the crusaders money, ships, and part of the spoils of war.

read more on -