How did human societies change as a result of job specialization during the neolithic revolution?
a. neolithic societies became divided between hunters and gatherers.
b. neolithic societies developed more diverse goods and products.
c. neolithic societies began to divide food and goods more equally.
d. neolithic societies were able to travel over long distances more frequently.

The correct answer is B) Neolithic societies developed more diverse goods and products.

Human societies changed as a result of job specialization during the Neolithic Revolution in that Neolithic societies developed more diverse goods and products.

During the Neolithic Revolution or Agriculture Revolution, humans stopped being nomads and settled in places next to rivers and learned agriculture techniques. They used to follow animal herds to hunt them. Not anymore. The first ancient civilizations were the Sumerians that established in the middle of the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates or the Egyptian civilization that established nest to the Nile River. These societies started to develop more diverse goods and products for consumption and trade with other towns or city-states.

a sample of water is taken and kept in a beaker in a freezer at a constant temperature of 0°c. if the system is at dynamic equilibrium, which of these statements is true?  

the vast majority of ballots have been counted nearly two weeks after one of the biggest political upsets in modern u.s. history catapulted donald trump to the presidency.

estimates show more than 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls during the 2016 election, nearly breaking even with the turnout rate set during the last presidential election in 2012, even as the final tallies in states like california continue to be calculated, according to statistics collected by the u.s. elections project.

but among those figures were stark contrasts in key states that swing the election to trump — in ohio, wisconsin, iowa, michigan and elsewhere — indicating the president-elect’s leap from long-shot candidate to the most powerful political position in the world may have happened in part because of apathy toward hillary clinton’s candidacy, especially among the democratic base, several political scientists and organizations monitoring voter turnout told the pbs newshour.

while clinton is leading the popular vote by more than 1.5 million over trump as of sunday, she trails president obama’s 2012 totals by more than 2 million ballots — a chasm that may have cost her the election, said david becker, co-founder of the center for election and innovation and research.

“several million voters didn’t come out to vote,” becker said. “which is telling me that this idea of the trump wave, a huge number of voters shifting over to trump, is certainly not the story.”