subject
History, 13.12.2020 07:50 ramirezzairap2u4lh

Because I see no certainty that the seceding states will ever be confederated again; none that the border states will secede at all; and if they should, I see no reliable ground for believing that they would incorporate themselves with the Gulf or cotton states in a new government. I see no surety either that Texas would unite with them. –“A Protest against the Ordinance of Secession,”
James G. Taliaferro

Which statement best summarizes Taliaferro's argument?

The cotton states would need a new government if they seceded.
Texas would be sure to unite against the seceded states.
There is no reason to believe that any states that seceded would unite under a confederation.
It is very unlikely that all of the border states will secede.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
Why do you think the delegates to the first contintal congress believed that refusing to buy british goods would their cause?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Civil liberties in latin america vary. this means that
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
Why was the pension issue relevant to the politics of cleveland's presidency?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 12:00
Why did the federalists support the ratification of the constitution? they believed in a strong federal government. they thought that it would end slavery. they were afraid the british would take over again. federalists believed the constitution provided just the right mix of power and limitations on power.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Because I see no certainty that the seceding states will ever be confederated again; none that the b...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2020 15:22
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2020 15:22
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2020 15:22
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2020 15:22
question
Social Studies, 19.05.2020 15:22
Questions on the website: 13722363