(PLEASE HELP)Because in secession I see no remedy for the actual and present evils complained of, and because the prospective evils depicted so gloomily may never come; and if they should, the inalienable right to resist tyranny and oppression might then be exercised as well and as successfully as now. –“A Protest against the Ordinance of Secession,”

James G. Taliaferro

What "prospective evils” is Taliaferro referring to? Check all that apply.

Lincoln might bring an end to slavery and injure the economy.

The federal government might interfere more in state issues.

Lincoln might persecute Southern leaders who oppose him.

Southerners’ voices might not be heard by the federal government.

Federal tariffs will likely be eliminated.

Politicians from the South might be replaced by Northern politicians.

The problem of evil is the question of how to reconcile the existence of evil and suffering with an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient God.[1][2] The best known presentation is attributed to the Greek philosopher Epicurus by David Hume, who was responsible for popularizing it. Hume summarizes Epicurus's version of the problem as follows: "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then from whence comes evil?"[3]

Explanation:

australian plates collided into eurasian plates, and the himalayas formed. the andes mountain range the himalayas and the islands of japan form differently. the andes mountain range formed at the convergent boundary of an oceanic plate and continental plate.