Video ( History Comes Alive: Latin America Revolutions) 15 points i really need help. Last question 7. What is the difference between Haiti and both Mexico and Gran Colombia at the times of their revolutions?

I will personally give more points to whoever does this thank you.

1. imperialism, slavery, mercantilism

2. Europe saw the colonies as a source of income and profit, usinf the univesal role of mercantilism, trade generates wealth and is stimulated by the accumulation of profitable balances, which a government should encourage by means of protectionism. and the natives of the land would get them those resorses for trade.

3. they often times gave benefits to natives that would convert to christianity.

4. the forces people to asimmalte to their culture by teaching them their sports, language, religion, ect. and refusal to do so could result in punishments however willingness to do so resulted in benefits

5. they will most likley come to hold distane upon them for the passed and making them assimalate to their culture and not allowing them to keep their native culture.

6. (i cant find the video but it should be stated if you look back through)

7. in hati they had more nations involded namley france and spain where as mexico only had to worry about spain. and in mexico they were led by a minister while in hati they were led by a former war hero and slave.

the expansion of the rule of empires over other territories took place as a result of several reasons including economic, ethnocentric, political, and religious, and exploratory purposes.

in terms of economic purposes: imperial governments aimed to maximize profits and with that purpose they neeeded cheap labor, access to or control of markets to sell or buy products. they also desired to find natural resources (precious metals and land). in the awake of   industrial revolution, dependent colonies provided the necessary raw materials that european factories and market needed to manufacture products.  

ethnocentric: many territories were conquered by imperial territories in an attempt to spread their cultures, values and belief as they considered them to be superior. in the late 19th century, for example, european powers held   the racist belief that inferior races should be conquered in order to “civilize” them.

political: another reason that drove conquer and expansion was patriotism and growing imperial power. it refers to national prestige, pride, and security. empires sought strategic territory to ensure access for their navies and armies around the world.

religious: the aim of converting new member of other religions was another factor that prompted expansion.   christian missionaries from europe established churches in conquered territories during the nineteenth century. thus, they spread western cultural values. furthermore, the imperial nation’s language was spread as well, through educational and religious interactions.

exploratory: imperial nations or their citizens aimed to explore territory that was unknown to them,   for different purposes including medical or scientific research, however, at the very   beginning, they did it to embark on adventure. furthermore, imperial explorers sought to discover, map, and claim territory before their imperial competition did, for national and personal glory as well as to realize the imperialist goal of expansion.

on this day in 1833, president andrew jackson announces that the government will no longer use the second bank of the united states, the country's national bank. a national bank had first been created by george washington and alexander hamilton in 1791 to serve as a central repository for federal fund