How did the case Miranda v. Arizona change the interpretation of the Fifth Amendment? It allows people to waive their right to Fifth Amendment protection.
It extended the protection to legal actions outside the courtroom.
It ensured that suspects always have an attorney if they want one.
It requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.

It requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.

Explanation:

The Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case brought to limelight the laxity of policemen in reminding arrested suspects of their rights of self incriminating as failure to inform them would render any confession made invalid in court. Miranda was not informed of his Constitutional rights before interrogation by the police.

The case Miranda v. Arizona change the interpretation of the Fifth Amendment because it requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.

a more perfect union: the creation of the u.s. constitution. the vote was unanimous. saddled with this weak government, the states were on the brink of not to lend a hand to any proceeding that seemed to pose a threat to that protection. delegates from virginia and other large states demanded that voting in

the answer is prolly b