subject
History, 03.12.2020 04:20 sarah8479

The U. S. Supreme Court came to a decision not long ago about the proper application of the word “use.” Briefly, the case in point was about a man named John Angus Smith who traded a handgun for cocaine. The law under which Smith was charged provided for a much more severe penalty—known as an enhanced penalty—if a gun was used in a drug-related crime than if no gun was involved. (In this case, the enhanced penalty was a mandatory thirty-year sentence; the “unenhanced” penalty was five years.) Justice Antonin Scalia argued that Smith’s penalty should not be enhanced because he did not use the gun in the way that the writers of the law had in mind; he did not use it as a gun. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor argued that the law requires only the use of a gun, not any particular kind of use. If you were a judge, would you vote with Scalia or with O’Connor? Construct an argument in support of your position.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:20
Which of the following statements is true about germany's use of u-boats?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Why did noli me tangere have such a big impression on the narrator?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
What did the marshall plan do ? apex a.send aid to countries in europe b.sent atomic weapons to asia c.sent more ships to the pacific d.sent aid to the soviet union answer ; is a
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What change took place in the african slave trade in the 1500's?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The U. S. Supreme Court came to a decision not long ago about the proper application of the word “us...
Questions
question
Biology, 30.07.2021 21:00
question
Mathematics, 30.07.2021 21:00
question
Mathematics, 30.07.2021 21:00
Questions on the website: 13722361