PLZ HELP ME A. S.A. P 45 points and Branliest will be given

In the space provided, propose an argument for or against the ratification of the U. S. Constitution in 1789. Establish yourself as a Federalist or Anti-Federalist and give evidence supporting your argument. Your argument should address the views of the opposing side, as well.

federalist

Explanation:

If I were a federalist I would be all in for the constitution. Federalists favour states unity under one central government, in this case our federal government. There's more order that way. The states can have their own laws while still abiding by the central government laws, and it keeps everything organized. Federalists would argue in support of the US constitution since it would unify all states under one government, making it easier to regulate trade between states, and keep order within the whole country, opposed to having several states that do their own thing. In order to build a strong country, everyone needs to be on the same page, therefore the US constitution must be drafted and that states must be unified. 

"the sepoy rebellion was the result of many, many influences and stressors on the cultures of india living under british rule. in britain, it's called the sepoy mutiny on the indian mutiny, but in india, it's called the first war of independence.

the main reason is concerned to the british paramountcy , the belief in british   dominance in india political, economic and cultural life had been introduced in india about 1820."

"they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people."

from the religious point of view, the conflicts began because of the enmity between catholic and protestants. in 1649, at the insistence of baltimore, the colonial assembly approved the act of religious tolerance, the first law in the colonies granting freedom of worship, though only for christians. in 1654, however, with the protestants of maryland in the majority, the act was revoked. the almost civil war broke out and order was not restored until 1658, when lord baltimore was returned to power.

on the issue of class conflict, the chesapeake region offered few economic opportunities to contract employees who had served their term of obligation. even with the small amount of capital needed to grow tobacco, former hired servants at best became subsistence farmers, a mature class for those called to rebellion, such as those proposed by nathaniel bacon. as the number of new hired workers declined because of limited chances of progress and reports of severe treatment, they were replaced by african slaves.

from the racial point of view, after 1660, the chesapeake colonies imposed laws that defined slavery as a lifelong and hereditary condition based on race. this made slaves profitable because planters could rely not only on their work but also on their children. the slave population, which numbered four thousand in virginia and maryland in 1675, grew significantly by the end of the century.