ANSWER ASAP Read the excerpt from A State of War and Peace.

This book will examine the intentions of the man who established the prizes, Alfred Nobel. He was famous for inventing dynamite and other explosives, and at the time of his death had ninety weapons factories around the world, so there is a lack of consensus as to how far his pacifist convictions went.

Which best describes the problem presented in this excerpt?

A. Alfred Nobel may not be the actual person who created the prizes.
B. Alfred Nobel’s personal beliefs seem to contradict the purpose of the prizes.
C. Alfred Nobel’s original goal was to give prizes to his business associates.
D. Alfred Nobel may have developed the prizes against his will.

B

Explanation:

PLS BRAINLIEST.

The answer is B becasue it THis text "and other explosives, and at the time of his death had ninety weapons factories " It gives example of what happened.

This is the entire text:

A State of War and Peace: A Look at the Nobel Peace Prize's Most Controversial Recipients

Introduction

Upon his death in 1896, Swedish chemist Alfred Nobel, inventor of dynamite, bequeathed the equivalent of $4.7 million (at the time of this publication) to create awards that would be his ultimate legacy. Every year the revered Nobel Prizes are given on December 10, the anniversary of Nobel's death. On this day, the world turns its attention on the Nobel Prize ceremonies in Sweden and Norway. The Nobel Prizes for Physics, Medicine or Physiology, Chemistry, and Literature are awarded in Stockholm, while the Nobel Peace Prize is awarded in Oslo. In addition to receiving the honor of a lifetime, Nobel laureates receive a diploma, a gold medal, and a large cash reward (In 2009 it was 10 million Swedish kroner, or 1.4 million in US doPresident Barack Obama, receives the award, it is no surprise that many voices bellow to oppose it. As soon as his nomination was announced, President Obama's critics pointed out the irony of choosing this leader, who at the time was in the middle of wars in Afghanistaontentious figures? Such figures include Yasser Arafat, awarded in 1994, the leader of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), whom detractors called an "unrepentant terroluding, if necessary, the use of force. Let us admit that anything at all is better than war. All borders would remain untouched, and a declaration should be made that any and every aggressor would have all of Europe against him."

Who then did this man of contradictions have in mind when he created the Peace Prize?

Thi

If we look at this text: "group of politicians without the qualifications or experience to make their difficult assessments? Despite the secrecy behind the selection process and a t" it give more examples of what is happenenidng and breif overvciew. This is in the last paragraph and it is providng the reacder with an overview or to summaraize the text.

The question being:

Which best describes the problem presented in this excerpt?

Alfred Nobel may not be the actual person who created the prizes.

Alfred Nobel’s personal beliefs seem to contradict the purpose of the prizes.

Alfred Nobel’s original goal was to give prizes to his business associates.

Alfred Nobel may have developed the prizes against his will.

You can use elemination to determin that A C dont make any sense.

So it leaves us with b and D.

Then you can determine B becasue reading this: huge task just to create a framework that met with his wishes. Over the years, it has sometimes seemed as if his goals were left far behind, and criticism has fallen hard on the committee members. Is the current committee just a group of politicians without the qualifications or experience to make their diff" proves that D IS INCORRECT

PLS BRAINLIEST SRY HAD TO CUT DOWN TEXT BECAUSE ANSWER WAS TOO LONG

what are local authorities doing to fix the problem

explanation:

yes

explanation:

the fighting words doctrine, in united states constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the first amendment to the united states constitution. in 1942, the u.s. supreme court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in chaplinsky v. new hampshire.