Are Epps’ concerns about contractions in voting rights legitimate or overblown? Why?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Epps’ concerns about contractions in voting rights are legitimate because the United States political arena lives a peculiar moment of notorious division between the American people due to the polarized opinions regarding the way the US government has to rule the country. That polarization is the product of the way Republicans and Democrats have been fighting since the Obama administration, but more specifically during the present administration.

We could dare to say that the issue worsened in these last four years. It passed from natural differences in political opinion to hate and verbal aggressions.

That is why the concerns of Tiana Epps-Johnson concerns are legitimate. She is the Executive Director of the Center for Tech and Civic Life.  

Epps’ concerns about contractions in voting rights are legitimate.

Tiana Epps-Johnson is the founder and executive director of Center for Tech and Civic Life, she in one of her statements express her concerns about contractions in voting rights.

In my view it was legitimate because of many reasons:

That is why the concerns of Tiana Epps-Johnson concerns are legitimate.

Learn More about Voting Rights:

link

after defeating german forces in north africa allied leaders turned their attention to "italy," since this was the location that made the most geographic sense before invading northern europe via france.