Scenario 1 Kristina wants to expand her custom furniture business. She’s been building furniture in her basement for a few years now. She started out selling only to friends and family and then began to sell online. Now she’s getting so many orders that she can barely keep up with them all. She knows that to expand, she needs to start a factory and hire workers. She decides on a location about 10 minutes from her home. Over dinner with a friend, she explains how fortunate she is to live near a major city with a big airport, a good highway system, and an educated workforce and to have a business in a state with minimal regulations and low taxes. Scenario 2 Andrew has been creating custom car accessories in his garage for years. He’s been selling so many accessories online that he can barely keep up with his orders. He lives in a small town, so there aren’t many people he can employ to work for him. He pays a significant amount of his income in taxes as well. He realizes he might need to move to expand his business. But he’s dreading the trip to investigate possible locations because it’s a two-hour drive on narrow two-lane roads to reach the nearest major airport. What is driving Andrew’s and Kristina’s decisions on where to expand their businesses?

a is true because it know the force.

ps maybe give us more info?

#mabyeustupid #fatboy

a

"the land of the dead"

atman means 'eternal self'. the atman refers to the real self beyond ego or false self. it is often referred to as 'spirit' or 'soul' and indicates our true self or essence which underlies our existence.

there are many interesting perspectives on the self in hinduism ranging from the self as eternal servant of god to the self as being identified with god. the understanding of the self as eternal supports the idea of reincarnation in that the same eternal being can inhabit temporary bodies.

the idea of atman entails the idea of the self as a spiritual rather than material being and thus there is a strong dimension of hinduism which emphasises detachment from the material world and promotes practices such as asceticism. thus it could be said that in this world, a spiritual being, the atman, has a human experience rather than a human being having a spiritual experience.

explanation:

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is