What were the Loyalists and the Patriots difference of opinions about British taxation and representation for colonists in the British Parliament?

Loyalists

1.A strong unified British

Empire is good for all

2. Colonist are British subjects

and should obey British law

3. Taxes are due to pay for the

French & Indian War which

was fought to protect the

colonies

4.American colonies would be

weak without Britain

5. Colonies profit from trade

with England

6. Colonies profit from trade

with England

7. Colonies are too far way

from England to have

representation in Parliament,

itʼs just not practical

a

Patriots

1. People have rights

government canʼt take away,

like property

2. Taxation takes away property

from citizens (i.e. - money and

goods)

3. Colonists donʼt have voice in

Parliament, so England

shouldnʼt tax colonies (No

taxation without

representation)

4. Thereʼs no way colonies could

ever be represented in

Parliament because it is too far

away.

5. Many colonist fought in the

French & Indian War (weʼve

done our part)

6. British personnel are causing

violence, riots, and death

(Boston Massacre & Boston

Tea Party)

Explanation:

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.