7. ANALYZING INFORMATION In Germany, there are strict laws to prevent the denial of the Holocaust. One such law reads: "Section 189: Disparagement of the Memory of Deceased Persons (1985, amendments of 1992) Whoever disparages [insults) the memory of a deceased
person shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than two years or a fine." Would this law be likely to be found constitutionally
valid if it was enacted in the U. S.? Why or why not?

It wouldn't because everyone has the freedom of speech regardless of how baseless a claim may be.

might be agreeing to participate ethically with other european nations in the slave trade

or notifying other european nations when taking possession   of african territories

pepin the short[a] (german: pippin der kurze, french: pépin le bref, c. 714 – 24 september 768) was the king of the franks from 751 until his death. he was the first of the carolingians to become king.[b][2]

the younger son of the frankish prince charles martel and his wife rotrude, pepin's upbringing was distinguished by the ecclesiastical education he had received from the monks of st. denis. succeeding his father as the mayor of the palace in 741, pepin reigned over francia jointly with his elder brother carloman. pepin ruled in neustria, burgundy, and provence, while his brother carloman established himself in austrasia, alemannia and thuringia. the brothers were active in suppressing revolts led by the bavarians, aquitanians, saxons, and the alemanni in the early years of their reign. in 743, they ended the frankish interregnum by choosing childeric iii, who was to be the last merovingian monarch, as figurehead king of the franks.