History, 03.11.2020 02:00 shaylawaldo11

National Security Policy must balance and ?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: evapoliziani

qwertyuip

Explanation: you smell like poop

Answer from: fainet

Military force and Diplomacy.

Explanation:

National security policy is a balancing act between Military force and Diplomacy. Military forces are needed when a direct threat exist and we need to take care of it immediately to protect our people from hurting.

Answer from: Quest

the answer is option b.

explanation:

they could veto laws. this announcement does not portray the individuals from the roman senate since the praetor urban was the one that could veto laws. the power or right vested in one part of an administration to drop or put off the choices, institutions, and so on., of another branch, particularly the privilege of a president, representative, or other ceo to dismiss bills gone by the lawmaking body.

Answer from: Quest

a hypothesis is an expected answer to a question, usually based on some theory or prior research. hypothesis testing is a method of determining the viability of a hypothesis. let’s use the us presidential election as an example. there are many hypotheses (questions) about how people feel or whom they will vote for. the only way to know the 100% “truth” about the answers to these questions is to ask every single possible voter – something that is impossible, expensive, time consuming etc. instead, we take samples and use statistics to make “best guesses” about the answer to a particular hypothesis. we never know for sure if our conclusion is right at the time we accept/reject it, but these techniques, when used appropriately can get us close to the truth most of the time (which is a lot better than guessing, flipping coins or throwing darts to get answers).

the tricky part about hypothesis testing is that we have to think somewhat backwards about it – we have to test what is known as the “null hypothesis”. as an example, the hypothesis might be “obama is more popular than romney” while the null hypothesis is “there is no difference in popularity between obama and romney”. we focus on the null hypothesis because it tells us exactly what the expected value of our tests should be (obama popularity = romney popularity) and we can collect data and see if it comes out that way (see next section on “significance”). if it does, then we “accept the null hypothesis” and reject our original hypothesis. if the null hypothesis is disproven, we look at the data to see if our original hypothesis holds (obama> romney).

Another question on History

History, 22.06.2019 04:30

Can someone me write a paragraph on this topic i feel confused

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 08:10

What does this interaction reveal about antony's agenda? o he intends to make lepidus one of the leaders of the divided empire o he intends to make lepidus a servant who runs errands o he plans to have lepidus tried and executed for his past o he plans to remove lepidus from power once he has and carries loads cimes served his purpose.

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 09:50

The best example of mobility rights as described in the canadian charter of rights and freedoms is

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 11:10

Which points did chief justice roger b. taney use to justify the supreme court’s ruling in the dred scott case? the property clause of the constitution, the due process clause of the fifth amendment, and the fact that african americans were not citizens. the practice of judicial review established in marbury v. madison, the property clause of the constitution, and the due process clause of the fifth amendment. the necessary and proper clause of the constitution, the due process clause of the fifth amendment, and the fact that african americans were not citizens. the commerce clause of the constitution, the elastic clause of the sixth amendment, and the practice of judicial review established in gibbons v. ogden.