Duruing the world war 1 how did war focused economics change the way industry operated

The economic history of World War I covers the methods used by the First World War (1914–1918), as well as related postwar issues such as war debts and reparations. It also covers the economic mobilization of labor, industry, and agriculture leading to economic failure. It deals with economic warfare such as the blockade of Germany, and with some issues closely related to the economy, such as military issues of transportation. For a broader perspective see Home front during World War I.

All of the powers in 1914 expected a short war; none had made any economic preparations for a long war, such as stockpiling food or critical raw materials. The longer the war went on, the more the advantages went to the Allies, with their larger, deeper, more versatile economies and better access to global supplies. As Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison conclude, once stalemate set in late in 1914: "The greater Allied capacity for taking risks, absorbing the cost of mistakes, replacing losses, and accumulating overwhelming quantitative superiority should eventually have turned the balance against Germany".[1]

The Allies had much more potential wealth they could spend on the war. One estimate (using 1913 US dollars) is that the Allies spent $147 billion on the war and the Central Powers only $61 billion. Among the Allies, Britain and its Empire spent $47 billion and the U.S. $27 billion (America joined after the war started) while among the Central Powers, Germany spent $45 billion.[2]

Total war demanded total mobilization of all the nation's resources for a common goal. Manpower had to be channeled into the front lines (all the powers except the United States and Britain had large trained reserves designed just for that). Behind the lines labour power had to be redirected away from less necessary activities that were luxuries during total war. In particular, vast munitions industries had to be built up to provide shells, guns, warships, uniforms, airplanes, and a hundred other weapons both old and new. Agriculture had to provide food for both civilians and for soldiers (some of whom had been farmers and needed to be replaced by women, children and the elderly who now did the work without animal assistance) and for horses to move supplies. Transportation, in general, was a challenge, especially when Britain and Germany each tried to intercept merchant ships headed for the enemy. Finance was a special challenge. Germany financed the Central Powers. Britain financed the Allies until 1916 when it ran out of money and had to borrow from the United States. The U.S. took over the financing of the Allies in 1917 with loans that it insisted be repaid after the war. The victorious Allies looked to defeated Germany in 1919 to pay reparations that would cover some of their costs. Above all, it was essential to conduct the mobilization in such a way that the short term confidence of the people was maintained, the long-term power of the political establishment was upheld, and the long-term economic health of the nation was preserved.[3]

Contents

1Europe

2Allies

2.1United Kingdom

2.1.1Energy

2.1.2Scotland

2.1.3Ireland

2.1.4Commonwealth and British Empire

2.1.4.1Canada

2.1.4.2Australia

2.1.4.3South Africa

2.2Belgium

2.2.1Belgian Congo

2.3France

2.3.1Finance

2.3.2French colonies

2.4Russia

2.5Italy

2.6United States

2.6.1Economic confusion in 1917

2.6.2Women

2.6.3Labor

3Central Powers

3.1Germany

3.2Ottoman Empire

3.3Austria-Hungary

3.4Bulgaria

4Neutral countries

4.1Chile

5Postwar

6See also

7External links

8Footnotes

9Further reading

9.1Europe and general

9.2Origins

9.3Britain

9.4Canada

9.5France

9.6Italy

9.7Russia

9.8United States

9.9Germany

9.10Ottoman Empire

9.11Austria-Hungary

9.12Primary sources

Explanation: you will have succsess

treating native americans justly and giving them equal rights as citizens of the united states" was not a way in which americans sought to solve the indian problem. removal was the most popular idea.