Why is a caucus a better representation of direct democracy ?

Share on Twitter

Share via email

Stumping for Hillary on Saturday in Meadville, PA at my alma mater, Allegheny College, former president Bill Clinton started a new line of argumentation about why superdelegates should move to his wife's candidacy. The basic premise of the argument is that caucuses are undemocratic and unrepresentative. He claims that a delegate at the Democratic National Convention who is from a caucus state equals 2,200 voters, while a delegate from a primary state is worth 11,000. In the clip below, Clinton says he is glad to be in Crawford County because it is "the home of the direct primary...and I think direct primaries are good. They are more democratic--small 'd' as well as big 'D.'"

Explanation:

an expansion is one of two basic business cycle phases; the other is contraction. the transition from expansion to contraction is a peak, and the changeover from contraction to expansion is a trough.

i do believe its (d) it allowed the government to offer pioneers sixty acres of western land if they lived on it and made improvements to it.

explanation: signed into law in may 1862, the homestead act opened up settlement in the western united states, allowing any american, including freed slaves, to put in a claim for up to 160 free acres of federal land. by the end of the civil war, 15,000 homestead claims had been established, and more followed in the postwar years