Saan nagkita-kita ang mga katipunero nang malaman ni Andres Bonifacio na maraming katipunero ang hinuli at doon nagplanong ipagpatuloy ang
paghihimagsik?

8 years 100% positive

explanation:

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

she thought that scott was her dead husband's property.

hope it : )

hi the answer to your question is

to control offices

this sparked alotof controversy more over ending the articles of federation