subject
History, 28.10.2020 20:30 sotocindy023

Pls Hurry What did Dred Scott argue in the Scott v. Sandford case?
O He was free because he had lived in free states.
O He was free because he was now a slaveholder.
O He should not have been captured because he was a fugitive.
O He should get his property back through due process.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
What clause of the treaty of versailles in particular left the germans feeling like they were “stabbed in the back? ” by the victors?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:50
What is intervention ? in government terms
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
What did the us civil rights movement gain new momentum after world 2
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:20
What was the significance of the british reform act of 1832? a. voters were given the right to vote by secret ballot b. members of the middle class were permitted to run for parliament c. members of the working class demanded and received better living conditions d. farm workers, factory workers, and women were given the right to vote
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Pls Hurry What did Dred Scott argue in the Scott v. Sandford case?
O He was free because he h...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2020 16:01
question
Physics, 19.08.2020 16:01
Questions on the website: 13722360