subject
History, 28.10.2020 18:50 nickname0097

The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. -Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Schenck v. United States (1919) Which interpretation of the Bill of RIghts does this statement illustrate?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
What were the terms behind germany's surrender during wwi?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
What was the effect of the industrial revolution on the working class?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
1. america's first national road morse 2. joined lake erie with the hudson river cooper 3. steam-driven locomotive erie canal 4. allowed businesspeople to keep in touch with trends cumberland 5. telegraph code fulton 6. clermont telegraph
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 18:00
Aresult of theodore roosevelt’s philosophy about conservation was
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a t...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 25.08.2019 15:10
question
Mathematics, 25.08.2019 15:10
question
Health, 25.08.2019 15:10
Questions on the website: 13722362