Why do federal district courts not try cases dealing with military matters, grievances against the government, or tax disputes? they cannot be expected to rule impartially on cases involving the government. original jurisdiction for such cases belongs to the supreme court. such cases are tried only in state courts, not in federal courts. congress has created specialized courts to deal with such cases.

Congress has created specialized courts to deal with such cases.

military matters, grievances against the government, or tax disputes are not dealing by federal courts as there are courts specialized in such cases, this is because often those type of cases involves military law, which is entirely different from civil law, so it make sense that specific courts should deal with those types of cases.

- "the past is made of multitudinous items ranging from anything that can be collected, recollected or assessed to originate in the past. as such, the past is a gallimaufry of particulars that may not have been related in any way. however, the human mind seeks organization to understand concepts and other things. the human mind therefore seeks relationships in explaining and studying the past. history being a humanity, dictates that historians have to serve this human trait by bringing structure to details of the past. historians do this by creating interpretive frameworks that capture as many details as possible."

< 3

a. i just did this quiz and the answer is a.