why are primary sources important when studying historical events? A. because they are a direct link to the events in history B. because we would know very little about major historical events without these sources C. because primary sources are the only way we can learn about the culture of a civilization D. because secondary sources are not reliable enough and can’t be trusted

A.

Explanation:

Primary sources are preferred over secondary sources because they are coming directly from someone who has been there and seen whatever you are researching.

several states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. the sherman antitrust act was based on the constitutional power of congress to regulate interstate commerce.

you answered my friends question just to get the coins you didn't even give a valid response.

an era of negotiation.

is that an answer to your question?