The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions, the Hartford Convention, and the South Carolina Exposition and Protest were similar in that all involved a defense of

The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions, the Hartford Convention, and the South Carolina Exposition and Protest were similar in that all involved a defense of States rights.

Explanation:

The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions are political statements that argued for the states' rights and deemed the Alien and Sedition Acts put forward by the federal government as unconstitutional.

The Hartford Convention was a group of meetings in which the New England Federalist Party hold a discussion on the importance and need of the United States government to protect their state and also supply financial aid.

The South Carolina Exposition and a Protest was a written document that articulates the importance of the state's rights of nullification. This right allows states to nullify and declare void any federal laws that it deems unfit and wrong for the state.

All three of these documents/ events were similar in their defense of the rights of states against the federal government.

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.

in the declaration of independence, thomas jefferson announced that every human being has “certain unalienable rights,” among which are those to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of " hope i