Should the United States return to George Washington's vision of avoiding "foreign
entanglements?" Why or why not? (you must
use COMPLETE sentences.)

The United States should not return to George Washington's vision of avoiding "foreign entanglements".

Explanation:

They should not return to that level of thinking because what if another world war happens and we are not alerted? What if Canada is attacked? Canada is located right next to us and could be considered a foreign entanglements. Canada could be invaded and another superpower could invade America through Canada.

necessary and proper clause. the congress shall have power to all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this constitution in the government of the united states, or in any department or officer thereof.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.