How is "...paying taxes without appeal when laws do not suit us" similar to the American Revolutionary war cry "no taxation without representation"?

"Paying taxes without appeal..." is similar to American Revolutionary war cry "no taxation without representation" because both are demanding for the right of Representation, without legal representation they questioned why should they give taxes.

During the British colonialist rule Americans were forced with Taxes and Acts which have only one objective that is to exploit them, such as Tea Act, the Stamp Act, or the Navigation Acts, they protested saying that they had no voice or representation in the British Parliament, than how come they could accept these taxes or acts.

During Women Suffrage the same demand arised as women were prohibited to vote, therefore "...paying taxes without appeal when laws do not suit us"  is similar to the American Revolutionary war cry "no taxation without representation".

As in both cases the petitioners questioned why they had to pay taxes when they did not have any rights.

Learn More about Women Suffrage:

link

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

How is "...paying taxes without appeal when laws do not suit us" similar to the American Revolutionary war cry "no taxation without representation"?

It is similar in that the petitioners of universal suffrage questioned why they had to pay taxes when they did not have any rights.

It is very similar to the case of the American colonies' time when colonists were angry against the English crown due to the many taxes imposed by the King of England such as the Tea Act, the Stamp Act, or the Navigation Acts. The English government forced Americans to pay taxes, but they protested saying that they had no voice or representation in the British Parliament.

"A Petition for a Universal Sufragge" was the document presented to the US Congress on January 29, 1866. The document was drafted by Elizabeth C. Stanton and Susan B. Anthony.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

"the sepoy rebellion was the result of many, many influences and stressors on the cultures of india living under british rule. in britain, it's called the sepoy mutiny on the indian mutiny, but in india, it's called the first war of independence.

the main reason is concerned to the british paramountcy , the belief in british   dominance in india political, economic and cultural life had been introduced in india about 1820."

"they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people."

read more on -

explanation: