subject
History, 17.10.2020 22:01 tamikeen9301

ASAP PLZ HELP, I will mark BRAINLIEST Read This and answer 2 questions:
“Democrats are understandably furious and fearful over the likelihood that President Trump and the Republican-controlled Senate will replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a conservative. That does not justify packing the Supreme Court with progressives in retaliation…
...The United States has faced this dilemma before. The incredibly bitter election of 1800 featured Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson and incumbent President John Adams, a Federalist, who traded accusations that the other was undemocratic and would destroy the new nation. Federalists responded by expanding the number of judges with what derisively became known as the Midnight Judges Act. Adams also appointed a new United States chief justice, John Marshall, who was confirmed by the Federalist-controlled Senate only seven days after his nomination. Jefferson’s party later repealed the act packing the lower courts and terminated the judgeships, but did not seek to pack the Supreme Court to override the Federalist majority, even after Marshall authored the landmark Marbury v. Madison opinion establishing the judiciary’s power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. The result was the establishment of the norm we have come to treasure: judicial independence even in the face of fierce partisanship.
That independence must be preserved — especially because the judiciary has assumed so much power since our nation’s founding. The court’s composition is politically controversial precisely because it has used the power Marshall established to decide politically contentious questions. Once courts become political footballs, new governments will expand courts to ensure that court rulings never go against their will. That would eviscerate the Bill of Rights, turning it from a protection against majority rule into a mere parchment proclamation….”
1) Within the context of the situation described in the excerpt above, explain how Judicial review is at work.
2) Explain how the scenario described in the excerpt above could affect the policy-making process.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
What did the french national assembly decide? peasants would only have to pay one-tenth of their earnings to the catholic church. the government could not legally charge taxes without first holding a vote. aristocrats would still receive special privileges as long as they paid a higher tax. employment would be available to all people, regardless of their social class.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:00
Which statement best explains the privileges and immunities clause of article iv of the constitution?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 14:00
Which colony leader urged virginia's to prepare for war
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 15:00
Brainliesme : )) what was the result of indian independence?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
ASAP PLZ HELP, I will mark BRAINLIEST Read This and answer 2 questions:
“Democrats are under...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363