And be it also further Enacted by the same authority ... that whatsoever person or persons shall... declare call or denominate any person or persons whatsoever ... within this
Province... an Heretic, Schismatic, Idolator, puritan, Independant, Prespiterian popish priest,
Jesuit, Jesuited papist, Lutheran, Calvinist, Anabaptist, Brownist, Antinomian, Barrowist,
Roundhead, Separatist, or any other name or term in a reproachful (disrespectful) manner
relating to matter of Religion shall for every such offense forfeit and lose the sum of ten
shillings sterling or the value thereof to be levied on the goods and chattels of every such
Offender and Offenders, the one half thereof to be forfeited and paid unto the person and
persons of whom such reproachful words are or shall be spoken or uttered, and the other
half thereof to the Lord Proprietary and his heirs Lords and Proprietaries of this Province...
Source: Maryland Toleration Act of 1649
1. A historian would best use this document as
(1) evidence of the punitive nature of colonial laws in Maryland
(2) evidence of intolerance of religious worship in colonial law
(3) evidence of colonial support for the democratic principle of religious tolerance
(4) the existence of a unified religious community in colonial America
2. This document most likely led to which result?
(1) forced exile of members of Protestant religious denominations from Maryland
(2) forfeiture of English citizenship by religious residents of Maryland
(3) conversion of thousands of Maryland residents from Catholicism to Protestantism
(4) the thriving of a variety of religious communities in the colony of Maryland

answer; ///i believe that the correct answer is (c)vetoing executive check first good luck

the answer is option a.

aug 15, 2012 - although van leeuwenhoek was not the inventor of the microscope, he advanced it more he loved to grind and focus a new lens in order to see the unseen world. most of leeuwenhoek's microscopes were silver. in a simple but significant experiment (1668), he demonstrated that worms found on

athenian democracy developed around the fifth century bc in the greek city-state (known as a polis) of athens, comprising the city of athens and the surrounding territory of attica, and is often described as the first known democracy in the world. other greek cities set up democracies, most following the athenian model, but none are as well documented as athens'.

it was a political system of direct democracy, in which participating citizens voted directly on legislation and executive bills. participation was not open to all residents: to vote one had to be an adult, male citizen, i.e., not a foreign resident, a submissive or a woman, and the number of these was "probably no more than 30 percent of the total adult population."[1]

the longest-lasting democratic leader was pericles. after his death, athenian democracy was twice briefly interrupted by oligarchic revolutions towards the end of the peloponnesian war. it was modified somewhat after it was restored under eucleides; the most detailed accounts of the system are of this fourth-century modification rather than the periclean system. democracy was suppressed by the macedonians in 322 bc. the athenian institutions were later revived, but how close they were to a real democracy is debatable. solon (594 bc), cleisthenes (508/7 bc), and ephialtes (462 bc) contributed to the development of athenian democracy. cleisthenes broke up the power of the nobility by organizing citizens into ten groups based on where they lived rather than on their wealth.

hope this !