Make an argument in defense of promoting the desires and interests of individuals above the public good. Use reason and evidence to support your argument. At least 150 (TT I'm so lost and I don't really know what to write)

the desire's and interest of other people are not ours to control because of the freedom of speech and promoting a free country such as the united states we the people have a right to vote as well as a right to have an opinion and a right to think for ourselves therefor nobody, i said Nobody have the right to tell me how to think or solve problems nor should they tell me how to react to anything.

i would appreciate the brainliest and hope this helps

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3

the main inference that can be drawn from jean jacques rousseau's book the social contract is: a. people can enjoy civil and physical freedom, even if it sometimes harms society.

hope this