Indivduals who use thier talents to Earn income on the market sometime claim that they ought to be
allow to keep all of the income because the morally deserve it. How would Rawls respond to this
Lion

It is likely that Rawls claimed that there is no certainty in the statement that you deserve the wealth that you have and that it was acquired through the exploitation of your own talents. This, therefore, is a doubtful statement and must be carefully evaluated.

Explanation:

John Rawls was not in favor of the idea that individuals who use their talents to generate their income are worthy of all their income. That's because For Rawls, the money these individuals get is not, in fact, generated by the talent they have, but by the demand that society imposes on these talents. Therefore, these individuals owe a debt to the society for which they work. This debt must be paid by taxing their income. This taxation will generate the resources that will pay the society that benefits these individuals.

the two colonies had the earliest laws mandating religious tolerance.

a politically correct answer.

northernmost part (disputed, administered) - near indira col, siachen glacier - 35.674520°n 76.845245°e

northernmost part (disputed, claimed) - dafdar near beyik pass - 37°24′00″n 75°24′00″e

northernmost part (undisputed) - near dharwas, chambal district - 33.24902°n 76.82704°e

southernmost part (mainland) - cape comorin - 8.06890°n 77.55230°e

southernmost part - indira point in the nicobar islands - 6.74678°n 93.84260°e

distance between:  

1 & 4 - 3070 km

1 & 5 - 3654 km

2 & 4 - 3269 km

2 & 5 - 3885 km

3 & 4 - 2801 km

3 & 5 - 3430 km

explanation: