subject
History, 17.08.2020 01:01 stheresa777

After Saddam Hussein’s forces were defeated in Iraq and driven from Kuwait, US and Allied leaders had a decision to make. Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator who victimized his own people and was proven to be willing to engage in warlike activities with neighboring nations. At the same time, the people of Iraq were divided along religious and ethnic lines. Without a strong leader, the country might devolve into chaos. US leaders decided to keep Saddam Hussein in charge of Iraq with severe limits on Iraq’s military. It was thought that the instability that might rise without a strong leader in Iraq was worse than Hussein’s brutal rule. Put yourself in the difficult position of making the decision as to whether to remove a dictator from control of an unstable country. What arguments could be made for removing the dictator? What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?

Question 1 options:

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:00
Apush explain two forces that led to african american suffrage & public service despite southern resistance
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
What was president nixon’s approach of using tension between us and other nations
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
When did stockpiles of strategic nuclear weapons begin to dramatically decline in the united states? a. the mid-1960s b. the mid-1970s c. the mid-1980s d. the mid-1990s
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:20
Religion or was a major factor contributing to the age of exploration? gold god glory grants
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
After Saddam Hussein’s forces were defeated in Iraq and driven from Kuwait, US and Allied leaders ha...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367