Dyess’s book was published when the war was still being fought. Beck and Burgos were interviewed in the 1990s, five decades after the war. How did Dyess’s account of the Bataan Death March differ from Beck’s and Burgos’s accounts? How were the accounts similar? Describe your answer in at least three sentences.

Dyess’ account of the Bataan Death March changed into just like Burgos’ and Beck’s money owed with inside the manner they defined the remedy of prisoners of war. The variations lie of their attitude of the Death March, and the timing in their interviews. Dyess changed into capable of offering greater elements because of the activities had been greater currently while he changed into interviewed. Their views range in that Dyess and Beck had the outsider’s factor of view, even as Burgos had the local’s factor of view.

Dyess’ account of the Bataan Death March changed into just like Burgos’ and Beck’s money owed with inside the manner they defined the remedy of prisoners of war. The variations lie of their attitude of the Death March, and the timing in their interviews. Dyess changed into capable of offering greater elements because of the activities had been greater currently while he changed into interviewed. Their views range in that Dyess and Beck had the outsider’s factor of view, even as Burgos had the local’s factor of view.

Explanation:

the differences in how soon after the Bataan Death March the accounts were given

the different perspectives of the three prisoners

the similarities between the prisoners’ situations

Explanation:

edg 2021

that is probably something for you to answer