subject
History, 01.08.2020 01:01 JadedylaneH3115

What significance did weapons of mass destruction have in the U. S. invasion of Iraq? A. President Bush said that weapons of mass destruction existed there, but that proved not the case.

B. Weapons of mass destruction played no part in the U. S. invasion of Iraq.

C. President Bush threatened to use weapons of mass destruction if the air attack was unsuccessful.

D. So many weapons of mass destruction were discovered in Iraq that it took longer than anticipated to locate all of them.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
The "nationalists" and fascists battled against the "republicans" and communists in a civil war in the 1930s in
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
The political cartoon below was drawn by thomas nast in 1871: a political cartoon shows a heavy set man with a long nose and a beard in a suit and vest. he is smoking a cigar and has a menacing expression. he leans against a large box that says, in counting there is strength. on top of that box is a smaller container labeled, the ballot. dialogue under the cartoon reads, thats whats the matter. boss tweed, as long as i count the votes, what are you going to do about it? say? public domain what issue does this cartoon address?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:30
An intersection of points outside the frontier (line) suggests that an economy is underutilizing it’s resources. true false
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:30
Missile sites located mainly in the north of its superpower a: communist countries b: democratic countries
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What significance did weapons of mass destruction have in the U. S. invasion of Iraq? A. President...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722366