Both the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the Freedom Rides were successful in that they resulted in the integration of transportation. What was the difference in the way the successful outcomes were achieved

the Freedom Rides succeded due to federal intervention; the Montgomery Boycott succeded due to local economic pressure.

Explanation:

In simple words, The distinction between the way the positive results were accomplished would be that the Freedom Rides succeeded because of government oversight; the Montgomery Protest succeeded because of regional economic coercion.

Throughout 1961, african americans and whites citizens demonstrated against all the segregation of public transit in the South. Such people found them the "Freedom Flyers" and wanted to use white people's facilities as allowed. This prompted police to interfere, and they were detained.

Citizens declined to ride buses in Montgomery , Alabama from December 5, 1955 to December 20. 1956, to condemn the imprisonment of Rosa Parks, a Black woman who declined to surrender her seat to a white commuter.

The Freedom Rides succeeded due to federal intervention; the Montgomery Boycott succeeded due to local economic pressure.

Explanation:

I'm sorry it's been so long, but I'll just leave this here

mexico south america

explanation: