I've literally been trying to get an answer for over an hour, please help :( "The United States was effective in containing the spread of Communism." To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

This answer is difficult. The United States fears communism, and set out to contain it around the world. During the Korean war, you could say the allies were successful containing communism due to the 38th parallel being created. But at the same time, they couldn't wipe communism out of all of Korea. The same goes for the Vietnam War. Another example is the failure of The Bay of Pigs invasion. The U.S failed in creating an uprising against the communist Fidel Castro. The U.S also could not keep China from becoming communist. But, you could say the Soviets failed in spreading communism because they were not able to spread it all across Europe.

Explanation: I hope this answers your question.

the zealots were for the military overthrow of roman rulers

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.