What do Tarbell and Rockefeller disagree about in these two readings ? - standard oil profited from railroad rebates.
- Rebates are an unfair business practice.
- standard oil purchased weaker companies .

Answer!! -> A and B

standard oil profited from railroad rebates

Explanation:

What Tarbell and Rockefeller disagree about in these two readings is that standard oil profited from railroad rebates.

The History of the Standard Oil Company is a book written in 1904 by a journalist named Ida Tarbell. It is an uncovering about the Standard Oil Company, which was run at the time by an oil tycoon named John D. Rockefeller, the wealthiest figure in American history. Originally arrange in nineteen parts in McClure's magazine, the book is a original and groundbreaking example of muckraking, and motivated many other journalists to write about trusts, huge or sizeable businesses that during the absence of strong antitrust laws in the 19th century set out or try to gain monopolies in various industries.

standard oil profited from railroad rebates

rebates are an unfair business practice

Explanation:

answer: idk

explanation: because i just don't

"the sepoy rebellion was the result of many, many influences and stressors on the cultures of india living under british rule. in britain, it's called the sepoy mutiny on the indian mutiny, but in india, it's called the first war of independence.

the main reason is concerned to the british paramountcy , the belief in british   dominance in india political, economic and cultural life had been introduced in india about 1820."

"they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people."

read more on -

explanation: