What was the effect of the Supreme Court decision described in this
headline?

A.

Explanation:

Miranda v. Arizona was the landmark case in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Miranda v. Arizona was the case Ernesto Miranda, was suspected of burglary, kidnap, and ra-pe. He was arrested by the police without prior informing him of his rights to 'remain silent' and hire an attorney as mentioned in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. Miranda's statement was recorded by the police with signed paper by him, in which he confessed his crime. But he was not aware of his rights, and was sentenced for 20-30 years of imprisonment.

Later, Miranda appealed to the U. S. Supreme Court, in which Chief Justice Earl Warren ruled that the recorded confession of the suspect can not approved by the government when the suspect was not aware of his/her rights.

Thus the headline of the newspaper actually suggested that the US Supreme Court protected the rights of the suspects according to the law of remaining silent and having an attorney present at the time of interrogation.

Thus correct answer is A.

hi how are you doing today? if you ever need just tell me

the noble might have thought that the system was far because they had lot of things and riches and the serf would have thought that the feudal system was un fair because of the way they were treated.