The Haitian Revolution has been a complete disaster. All of my friends are poorer now than when the revolution
started. We were the most productive, hardest working
people on the island, but now our fortunes have been
seized by corrupt politicians. Even the slaves who worked
on my plantation were much happier before the revolution;
I'm positive they'd like things to go back to the way they
were
Why would historians most likely question this source's credibility?
O A. It is highly personal and makes assumptions about other people's
feelings.
OB. It focuses on Haiti and ignores how the revolution affected other
countries
O C. It deals with distressing issues such as social hierarchies,
corruption, and slavery.
O D. It is critical of the Haitian Revolution, which freed all of the slaves
in Haiti

O A. It is highly personal and makes assumptions about other people's  feelings.

Explanation:

The credibility of any historical source depends on the nature of the source. If it is an unbiased and have a valid proof of the claim/ argument made, then we can say that the source is credible.

On reading the given passage, we can safely assume that it is not a credible source. One, because it contains a highly personal opinion of the Haitian Revolution. And two, it makes assumptions about the feelings of others, especially the slaves "who worked on [his/her] plantation". The speaker felt that the slaves in his plantation "were much happier before the plantation [.. and would] like things to go back to the way they were". This personal and assumptive opinion makes it easy for historians to question the source's credibility.

Thus, the correct answer is option A.

3. republican abraham lincoln

4. south carolina

5. charleston, south carolina

6. confederates

7. minie bullet - made defense even safer, it spun faster, traveled further and was five times more accurate than any single-man weapon. able to kill at half a mile, it was the largest contributor to battle wounds

      or the the gatling gun - the most successful of several rapid-fire guns that were born before the war. its efficiency in killing only made war more deadly.

idk which one u learned about. pick one.

8. the south was fighting to maintain its way of life, whereas the north was fighting to maintain a union. so they had will, and the north were fighing on unfamiliar territory

9. union had the large population, people to fight in the war and work in the factories to make war materials, industrial base, the factories to make these war materials. the union also was wealthier than the confederacy and could finance the war.

10. stonewall jackson

11. chancellorsville

12. gettysburg

13. sherman

some of these might be wrong but i tried my best.   : )

the answer is richard nixion