Why did Anti-Federalists favor a bill of rights? It would split power equally between the president and Congress. It would put goverment in the hands of individual states. It would give the government more power to make laws. It would protect individual citizens’ freedoms.

Anti-Federalists were in favor of the Bill of Rights because it would protect individual citizens' freedoms.

Explanation:

The Anti-Federalists were a political group led by Patrick Henry that, in the 1780s, began to fervently oppose the sanction of the Constitution on the grounds that it would impose a tyrannical government on the United States.

This belief came mainly from the fear that many settlers had towards one-person governments (such as the presidentialism that the Constitution intended to impose), because they believed that it could become a tyranny. This was based on the experiences that the colonists had with King George and the British rule in America, where the Thirteen Colonies had seen their rights violated against the absolutism that came from the British Isles.

Therefore, they demanded as a requirement for the approval of the Constitution the signing of a document that guaranteed the individual rights that had been the main independence motive (freedom and equality), in order to have a defense in case the ruling power would become authoritarian. Thus, the Bill of Rights was incorporated into the Constitution.

do u wanna me in my question and ill do your question?

answer:

it caused mass african migration, african populations to grow, african empires to topple, and racism against slaves to emerge.

background

early european explorers to the americas likely experienced emotions including awe at the vast "new" environment, amazement at meeting "others," the thrill of the unknown, concern for personal safety, desire for personal reward, and longing for their homeland and those left behind. written and pictorial records attributed to europeans provide the bulk of the records of these early travels. impressions of natives as well as native impressions of europeans are frequently framed in the narratives of the explorers. examination of these records indicates the cautious and curious nature of first encounters.

significance

centuries of ignorance, prejudice, and opinions lacking evidence or scholarly research have tainted traditional views of the earliest meetings between native americans (first nations in canada) and europeans. students may come to recognize how the later period of continued exploration, settlement, and interaction was influenced by these early encounters from the st. lawrence river to georgia.