subject
History, 01.07.2020 16:01 jerseygirl3467

By referring the matter from argument to arms, a new area for politics is struck; a new method of thinking hath arisen. All plans, proposals, etc., prior to the nineteenth of April, i. e., to the commencement of hostilities [Lexington and Concord], are like the almanacs of the last year which, though proper [accurate] then, are superseded and useless now. Whatever was advanced by the advocates on either side of the question then, terminated in one and the same point, viz. [that is], a union with Great Britain. The only difference between the parties was the method of effecting it — the one proposing force, the other friendship; but it hath so far happened that the first hath failed and the second hath withdrawn her influence. Paine compares the attempts to reconcile with Britain after the Battle of Lexington and Concord to an old almanac. What does he mean? What did investigations soon reveal?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:10
How did emperor justinian’s review of roman laws create a more efficient legal system? a.he got rid of outdated and repetitive laws.b.he ranked the laws according to importance.c.he created new laws to address modern situations.d.he combined minor laws into stricter categories.ill mark brainliest
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 16:20
3key facts about the battle of britain
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
Choosing to engage in military action to assist another country is an example of sanctions. internationalism. o isolationism. o diplomacy.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
According to the document, why can't the pope and the catholic church in rome make decisions for england? use evidence.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
By referring the matter from argument to arms, a new area for politics is struck; a new method of th...
Questions
question
English, 22.04.2020 20:14
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2020 20:14
Questions on the website: 13722366