2 Points How were mass killings in Bosnia and in Darfur handled differently by the
global community?
A. Aid organizations waited until the violence in Bosnia had ended
before they intervened, but they were more proactive in preventing
violence in Darfur,
B. Violence in the Balkans ended as a result of the unified
intervention of several countries, but in Darfur only the United
States provided military support,
C. NATO countries used military force to end genocide in Bosnia, but
the United Nations did not have the authority to end the violence
in Darfur
D. The United Nations assisted the Bosnian people in solving their
own conflicts, but took a more aggressive and involved approach
in Darfur,

the growing interconnectedness of the world through communication, trade, and the exchange of ideas is an important theme in the history of the 20th and 21st centuries.

explanation:

explanation:

i think it is in quadrant 4.

the five year plans were part of a command economy. there was little choice in what would be emphasized for the current 5 year period.

the answer to democracy or totalitarianism is a bit harder. in stalin's time, russia was totalitarian. now that's not entirely true. putin has moved towards at least the boundary.

the manhattan project's indispensable man

according to howard zinn, the history presents the encounter between columbus and the arawaks as a heroic adventure of descovery but leaves in the shades the cruel slavery and bloodshed columbus led in order to pay back to his investors. he sent the indians back to his nation as a payment, slaved them to find gold in the land and punished them when they didn't find any. history presents columbus as a heroe and even celebrates his day, when in reality he led a genocide. zinn describes the story of the colonization from the arawaks point of view.