subject
History, 03.06.2020 13:01 ddarby

Read these two scenarios, and then answer the question that follows. Scenario 1 Hector has worked in a small furniture factory for 10 years. He hasn’t had a pay increase in eight years. He frequently works 10 days in a row before getting a day off, and he often works extra hours with no extra pay. He knows that if he quits, the company will just hire someone else to replace him. Scenario 2 Victor has worked in a steel factory for 10 years. He hasn’t received a pay raise in the 10 years he has been there and often works two weeks before getting a day off. While speaking with his coworkers, he realizes that hardly any of them are satisfied with this situation. So they approach their manager as a group and threaten to quit unless the company increases their pay and gives them days off on a weekly basis. Realizing it would be difficult to replace all of the factory workers, the company gives in to their demands. What is the difference between these two situations?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 13:00
What was one major advantage that the united states industrialize rapidly in the early 19th century?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
Use the quotation and your knowledge of social studies to answer the following question. "finally, in our progress toward a resumption of work we require two safeguards against a return of the evils of the old order; there must be a strict supervision of all banking and credits and investments; there must be an end to speculation with other people's money, and there must be provision for an adequate but sound currency." —franklin d. roosevelt, first inaugural address. which new deal agency related most closely to what president roosevelt was speaking about in this quotation?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
Wiiy is limportant to consider the historical context surrounding an event when making a historical interpretation? o a. a conclusion that does not consider context is a generalization rather than an interpretation. b. historical interpretations are not valid if they are written in a similar context as the event. o c. every historical interpretation must consider the long-term consequences of an event. o d. the setting of an event can provide insight into why it happened.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 12:30
The andean nation of bolivia is poor but rich and natural attractions that file growing ecotourism economy
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Read these two scenarios, and then answer the question that follows. Scenario 1 Hector has worked in...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.06.2021 01:30
question
Mathematics, 28.06.2021 01:30
question
Business, 28.06.2021 01:30
question
Mathematics, 28.06.2021 01:30
Questions on the website: 13722367