How would an elevation map of an area with hills differ from an elevation map of an area with mountains?

How would an elevation map of an area with hills differ from an elevation map of an

area with mountains?

A The rings in the elevation map of an area with hills are farther apart. The rings in the elevation map of an area with mountains are closer together.

B The rings in the elevation map of an area with hills are closer together. The

rings in the elevation map of an area with mountains are farther apart.

C The rings in the elevation map of an area with hills are thicker. The rings in the elevation map of an area with mountains are thinner.

D The rings in the elevation map of a hill are brighter. The rings in the elevation map of a mountain are darker.

A. The rings in the elevation map of an area with hills are farther apart. The rings in the elevation map of an area with mountains are closer together.

Explanation:

A map is a geographical term, that describes the visual representation of an entire area or a part of an area, which is often shown on a flat surface. It can be used to depicts various information such as political boundaries, physical features, roads, topography, population, climates, natural resources and economic activities.

Elevation map is however a type of map which shows the different elevations of an area, that is, it represents how high or low the land is. In elevation map representation, the rings show elevation—the closer together they are, the higher the land, and the farther apart the rings are, shows the land is nearly flat in that area.

Hence, the elevation map of an area with hills differ from an elevation map of an area with mountains, by showing that, the rings in the elevation map of an area with hills are farther apart, while the rings in the elevation map of an area with mountains are closer together.

executive, (president and about 5,000,000 workers) legislative (senate and house of representatives) and judicial (supreme court and lower courts)

explanation:

and contrast the 1920 and 2010 census reporting methodologies in an essay of about three hundred words