subject
History, 27.05.2020 23:59 ndh64

One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is based on the legal system of the Roman Republic. What could be the reason for the difference of opinion between these experts?

Group of answer choices

one historian did not examine primary sources

one of the historians' research has serious flaws

they used different secondary sources for research

their interpretations of historical facts vary

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
What was the main aim of operation torch which was launched by the allies
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
Explain the first meeting between robespierre and louis xvi after louis is crowned king? fast
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 14:00
Why did new england colonies develop the whaling timber harvesting and shipbuilding industries
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 16:50
What possible disadvantage of interest groups does this scenario illustrate
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.06.2021 06:30
question
Mathematics, 18.06.2021 06:30
question
English, 18.06.2021 06:30
question
Mathematics, 18.06.2021 06:30
question
English, 18.06.2021 06:30
question
Mathematics, 18.06.2021 06:30
question
English, 18.06.2021 06:30
Questions on the website: 13722367