According to the data in the table, which of the following statements describes the Supreme Court's application of the doctrine of selective incorporation?

A large number of personal liberties and protections were incorporated by the Supreme Court during the 1960s.
The Supreme Court was mostly concerned with protecting procedural liberties over substantive liberties during the early 1900s.
Early in the 1900s, the Supreme Court followed a plan of complete implementation and only changed to selective incorporation during the Warren Court.
The Supreme Court was mostly concerned with protecting substantive liberties over procedural liberties during the early 2000s.

honestly you should get that checked out because it really isn't normal

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

i am not 100   percent sure but i do know that hitler was burned to death with gas so that makes me think it is d. because they were under his control if they fail or not do as told they will be killed but i could be wrong hope this