subject
History, 05.05.2020 09:31 sanociahnoel

In the case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court established the idea that law enforcement must:

have a warrant before searching or arresting a suspect.

not question suspects unless they are under arrest.

present a judge with probable cause to determine if a warrant can be issued.

inform suspects they have the right to keep silent and have an attorney present with them during questioning.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:30
Brainliesttt asap!me : ) answer in your own words. what was the relationship between medieval theories about scientific reasoning and the kind of reasoning favored during the scientific revolution?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
What is one way scalawags were significant during the reconstruction in the south?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
Me < 3 there are multiple ‘3rd party’ political parties in the us. what are the benefits of having 3rd parties? what are the disadvantages of being a member of one? would the u.s. benefit if there were more 3rd parties created, more support for the current ones, or would it be best to get rid of them altogether? why?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:50
Those who resisted the mongol invaders were attacked and their towns burned; those who cooperated with them also were attacked and had their towns burned. were treated fairly. were taken into the tribes and treated as mongols. were sent away to find new homes.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In the case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court established the idea that law enforcement m...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 01.12.2020 19:50
question
Mathematics, 01.12.2020 19:50
Questions on the website: 13722367