Why did the Virginia Plan give Congress the power to strike down laws made by state legislatures? What arguments could you make for or against giving Congress has power?

the national government would have 3 branches, congress will have 2 houses, number of reps for each states would be based on size of population, congress will have the power to make laws and strike down star laws, congress can call forth the armed faces of the nation against a stateExplanation:

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation:

deseasie in europe