The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God and that there is no force of law in public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If "thou shall not covet" and "thou shall not steal" are not commandments of heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society before it can be civilized or made free. What does Adams believe about the right to property? Check all that apply. property must be recognized as sacred and should be protected by law failure to protect the right of property can lead to a chaotic society property doesn’t need to be protected by law according to God, people should not steal property is not as valuable as the laws of God

failure to protect the right of property can lead to a chaotic society

Explanation:

This paragraph claims that properties should be protected by right and not seen to be undeserving of a legal backing since they are viewed as less sacred. It further points out the possible tyranny and anarchy that might emerge if properties are not backed with a force of justice to protect them.

Considering the excerpts from Adams in the question, what he believed about the property right is that:

This is evident when he said that "anarchy and tyranny commence" when there is no public law or the belief of the laws of God in the sacredness of the land.

Also, he suggested that "if thou shall not covet" and "thou shall not steal" are not part of God's law, the society itself should embrace the idea, otherwise, such society will not be considered civilized nor free.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is: "property must be recognized as sacred and should be protected by law; failure to protect the right of property can lead to a chaotic society."

Learn more here: link

they wanted the u.s. to fight on the side of the central powers.