Read the excerpt below from the Supreme Court ruling in the Scott v. Sandford.
[Ujhe legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show, that
neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free
or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people.
The main subject of the excerpt is
the lack of citizenship for enslaved people
the practice of importing enslaved people from Africa
the practice of relocating from a slave state to a free state
the right of an owner to retain his or her property.

the lack of citizenship for enslaved people

Explanation:

Scott v. Sandford basically argued Whether or not African American were allowed to sue in a federal court.

The constitution only granted that right to sue to the citizens of of United States. But the supreme court ruled that the African American were brought into United States as a form of 'property'. So, they're not considered  the African American as 'People' that could gained citizenship.

Therefore, Scott was not allowed to sue in a federal court.

a politically correct answer.

northernmost part (disputed, administered) - near indira col, siachen glacier - 35.674520°n 76.845245°e

northernmost part (disputed, claimed) - dafdar near beyik pass - 37°24′00″n 75°24′00″e

northernmost part (undisputed) - near dharwas, chambal district - 33.24902°n 76.82704°e

southernmost part (mainland) - cape comorin - 8.06890°n 77.55230°e

southernmost part - indira point in the nicobar islands - 6.74678°n 93.84260°e

distance between:  

1 & 4 - 3070 km

1 & 5 - 3654 km

2 & 4 - 3269 km

2 & 5 - 3885 km

3 & 4 - 2801 km

3 & 5 - 3430 km

explanation:

the correct answer is d